Thursday, 20 April 2017

The Fallout from 210: How the NYSAC Made A Mess Of It

So you may have heard, but there were a few controversies and dramas surrounding the latest UFC pay-per-view event. So many, in fact, that I remember remarking on the night that this was the most pro-wrestling the sport of MMA has ever been.

As a result, the New York State Athletic Commission has taken rather a significant pounding in the press or their part in the whole debacle, with three distinct events that will have irritated Dana White no end.

Without wanting to rub salt in the rather large wounds, particularly considering this is a Commission that has only taken part in a handful of MMA events since legalising the sport last year, in this post I'll take you through each of the issues over the weekend, the actions of the governing body, and why their decisions were wrong.

Friday:

Issue Number 1 - A New Superhero from DC: The Amazing Weight Loss Towel

Situation: At the official weigh-ins for the main event, Daniel Cormier misses weight by 1.2 pounds, which would see him forfeit his title and 20 per cent of his fight purse to Anthony Johnson. However, a few minutes later, the champion returns to the scale, and, with the help of some downward pressure on a handily placed towel, successfully weighs in at 205 pounds.

What the Commission did: Nothing. In fact, they actively said there had been no wrongdoing by DC or his coaches in the media immediately following the event.

Why that was wrong: As both Michael Bisping and Demetrious Johnson have pointed out in interviews, it's simply cheating. Now I am not of the same mindset of those two fighters, who have suggested that it's a good thing that DC 'tried it on and got away with it'. For me, cheating is cheating, and the Commission should have spotted it at the weigh-ins, or once the replay had been shown and the offence become apparent, they should not have taken the easy way out and instead come down on Cormier.

Solution: Anthony Johnson's team has launched a formal appeal to the Commission, calling for DC to be stripped of the title and 20 per cent of his fight purse given to Rumble. As the fight has already gone ahead, and DC retained, it seems unfair to strip the champ of his title on this occasion. However, I would take the 20 per cent, and I would immediately put in place a rule outlawing any touching of the towel if one is required at the weigh-ins.

Issue Number 2: May the Breast Fighter Win

Situation: Having successfully completed the ceremonial weigh-ins, it comes out that Pearl Gonzalez, who is booked for three rounds on the main card against streaking and unbeaten strawweight Cynthia Calvillo, has breast implants. This goes against the New York State Athletic Commission's regulations for combat sports.

What the Commission did: Here's where it gets a bit blurry. It was initially reported that Gonzalez had been pulled from the card for breaching the regulations, but within a matter of hours, the UFC had come out to say that this was not the case, and the fight would take place as normal. With its extensive experience in boxing, the New York State Athletic Commission had established the no implants rule for that sport, and there had not been a specific rule for MMA. While Dana White blamed the story on the media (and given his new-found friendship with the NYSAC, he was unlikely to do anything else), it seems a bizarre one for them to make up.

Why that was wrong: While not as severe as the previous incident, it's just another rather shambolic issue for the Commission to have to deal with. In a situation where confusion reigns, the spotlight is shone more heavily on those supposed to be regulating, highlighting their lack of control and understanding. In this instance, the confusion came from the lack of awareness around which rules are relevant to MMA, however, in my opinion, the fact that a new sport does not have its own rules and is instead borrowing from another similar sport, is bizarre. Could you imagine if football and rugby did the same thing?

Solution: Make a decision and stick with it. Simple as that. Or maybe make it clear which rules you're moving over from boxing and which ones will be specific to MMA.

Saturday:

Issue Number 3: 'Kneegate'

Situation: In the co-main event, Gegard Mousasi, having rocked Chris Weidman in round two, found himself in a dominant position with the American bent over. The Dutchman quickly landed two knees, leading referee Dan Miragliotta to quickly jump in, thinking that the strikes were illegal.

What the Commission did: With Weidman believing he had five minutes to recover, the ref called in the doctors and checked with fellow official John McCarthy on the video replay. With this revealing that the knees were in fact legal, there was confusion over whether the fight should be restarted or stopped, with the doctors allowing Weidman to continue to recover. Eventually, the fight was declared over and Mousasi was given the controversial TKO win.

Why that was wrong: Where to start? Ignoring the initial incorrect call by the referee, which shouldn't, but can happen at any moment, the Commission made a real mess of it. Firstly, with the NYSAC rules stating that video replays are not allowed, allowing the consultation between Miragliotta and McCarthy was wrong. However, having discovered the knees were legal, the referee and doctors still elected to allow Weidman the full five minutes to recover, which again, was wrong. Finally, having used all that time, the doctors and the ref realised their error on the second point and realised that this fight could no longer be restarted in a fair way. As a result, the contest was ended, despite the fury of the American, giving Mousasi the win in the worst possible way.

Solution: Assuming that this referee mistake happens, the answer is again relatively simple. Stick to your rules, regardless how stupid. If you want to live in a 20th century world with no video replay, you can't use it and Weidman must be given the full five minutes to recover and the fight restarted. However, the American doesn't cover himself in glory, firstly playing the 'hands-down' game, before then doing an Oscar-worthy act to attempt to cause a disqualification. He needs to man up and get back on with the fight - he talks about how he was screwed, but he was attempting to screw Gegard, so he has no leg to stand on in that regard.

Across all of these issues, there is one common theme: agree a universal rule set that is applied by every athletic commission across the world. This current system of on one week, off the next, is absolutely ridiculous, and can only be confusing to the fighter and the officials.

That means, in my eyes, the introduction of the following regulations:

  • If a towel is required at the weigh ins, it must be held out of the reach of the fighter on the scale to prevent any cheating
  • Women (or indeed, men) with breast implants are allowed to fight
  • Video replays are permissible for all suspected fouls, covering eye pokes, grounded opponents and groin shots
  • If a referee's decision is shown to be incorrect, the fight should be restarted as soon as possible, and placed in the same position as it was when stopped
  • A grounded opponent is one with at least one knee on the floor - hands are irrelevant to this
  • Any fighter deemed to be intentionally using the 'grounded fighter' rule to their advantage in an unnatural way will be deducted a point
  • All rules must be agreed and adopted by all athletic commissions at the same time
What was your view of these controversies, and how would you have handled them differently if you were at the head of the New York State Athletic Commission?

Let me know your thoughts either in the comments section below, or on Twitter @TheWeighInMMA.

Tuesday, 11 April 2017

The Curse of the Lost Title: What Is The Impact of Giving Up The Belt?

In the highly unpredictable environment of MMA, where one shot can end a fight, much is made of the difficulty to get a title shot, with many fighters needing to rack up long win streaks to be in contention. Most recently, UFC featherweight Max Holloway put together an impressive nine fight run before being handed an interim shot at UFC 206, the same as lightweight Tony Ferguson, while the likes of Khabib Nurmagomedov and Donald Cerrone both managed eight straight victories in their respective divisions. Middleweight Yoel Romero is also expected to match the nine straight having been overlooked for a shot at Michael Bisping's title, with the Brit opting to fight the returning Georges St-Pierre.

However, it appears another difficult situation is often overlooked. As a champion, there can be no greater pain than losing your title, and recovering from this setback takes real courage and guts. Nevertheless, this does not always go to plan. Ronda Rousey can attest to this, with her return to the Octagon following the heart-breaking loss to Holly Holm ending in a 48 second TKO defeat to UFC bantamweight champion Amanda Nunes. With the idea of the ex-champion being on a two fight losing streak unthinkable less than 18 months ago, it seemingly follows that the initial defeat had a significant impact on momentum and confidence, leading to the second.


This situation is certainly not an uncommon one among ex-UFC champions. In fact, if we look at the stats, this has happened on 23 occasions, representing 60 per cent of all champions. The list of names is astonishing, including the original heavyweight champion Mark Coleman, Anderson Silva, BJ Penn, Tito Ortiz, Vitor Belfort, Chuck Liddell, Lyoto Machida, Brock Lesnar and Randy Couture - twice! Hardly transitional champions, I think you'll agree!

As you can see, minus flyweight, which has yet to see a former champion, this transcends a wide range of weight classes and time periods, from Rafael dos Anjos at lightweight through to Kevin Randleman at heavyweight, and has made its way into the comparatively fledging women's division, affecting every former bantamweight champion. Sure, there are more heavyweights on this list than any other, but that makes sense given the number of champions in that division versus the rest.



So if there are no trends that can be identified by weight class or time period, is there a reason behind this? The obvious argument to make would be momentum, and how the loss of one fight can very easily lead to declining confidence, resulting in further defeats. However, this is undermined by some additional statistics. The eagle-eyed (or perhaps MMA-nerds) will have noticed that the above list neglects to mention those that did not lose their belts inside the Octagon. The likes of Tim Sylvia, Frank Mir, Dominick Cruz and Jon Jones were either stripped of their titles, or were forced to relinquish due to injury or contractual issues. No momentum loss for them, you may think?

Well actually, revisiting the statistics, we see that of the 10 former champions that were either stripped or relinquished their titles, five went on to lose their following fight. While both of the most recent examples did return with a win, fighters that failed include Couture, Sylvia, Mir and Sherk, meaning that the ratio is not significantly altered whether the belt is lost inside the cage or out.

If not momentum, were these former champions simply outclassed by the same opponent? Again, no. Of the 48 former champions, only three have lost consecutive bouts to the same foe. Belarusian heavyweight Andrei Arlovski suffered a shock KO defeat to Tim Sylvia in April 2006, before losing the rematch by decision three months later, while BJ Penn lost consecutive unanimous decisions to Frankie Edgar in 2010. Most recently, the greatest of all time, Anderson Silva, was famously knocked out by Chris Weidman while clowning in the cage, before suffering a horrendous broken leg in the rematch in 2013. While I'd argue that the latter shouldn't really be counted in the same way as a KO or decision defeat, the loss remains on his record, so requires inclusion.

The answer is unlocked when we look at the statistics from the UFC's greatest rival, Bellator. While comparatively in its infancy, the promotion has had a total of 26 previous champions across its male and female divisions. Surprisingly, nearly a quarter of those have already either been stripped or relinquished the title, meaning that we have a measurable sample size of 20 ex-title holders. Of those, just 35 per cent lost back to back fights, a significant departure from the majority seen in the UFC.

When you look at some of the cards put out by mixed martial arts' secondary organisation, it's easy to see why. Outside of the main and co-main, there is a distinct lack of strength in depth at Bellator, meaning that an ex-champion can ease themselves back into the title picture with a win over a fighter that really isn't in their league. Meanwhile, look at the top 10s of all of the UFC's weight classes. Apart from the heavyweights, it's a murderers row, and there are no easy fights to recover. For example, look at each of the most recent ex-champions' return fights in the UFC, and judge for yourself:

  • Heavyweight - Fabricio Werdum vs Travis Browne
  • Light-heavyweight - Jon Jones vs Ovince Saint-Preux
  • Middleweight - Chris Weidman vs Yoel Romero
  • Welterweight - Johny Hendricks vs Matt Brown
  • Lightweight - Rafael dos Anjos vs Tony Ferguson
  • Featherweight - Jose Aldo vs Frankie Edgar
  • Bantamweight - TJ Dillashaw vs Rafael Assuncao
  • Women's Bantamweight - Miesha Tate vs Raquel Pennington
  • Women's Strawweight - Carla Esparza vs Julianna Lima

With the awareness of MMA growing seemingly by the day, and the number of individuals taking up the sport also on the rise, this is an issue that is only going to become more pronounced as the quality of fighters continues to improve. With this in mind, it will be interesting to see not just the returns of the likes of Eddie Alvarez, scheduled to face Dustin Poirier, Luke Rockhold, Robbie Lawler and Dominick Cruz, but to see how future defeated champions are able to cope as they are thrust back into the hungry lions' den that is mixed martial arts competition.